Kirkpatrick v. New York
414 U.S. 948, 94 S. Ct. 283
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 23, 1973
DocketNo. 73-104
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 414 U.S. 948 (Kirkpatrick v. New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kirkpatrick v. New York, 414 U.S. 948, 94 S. Ct. 283 (1973).
Opinions
Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., [949]*949dissenting)), would note probable jurisdiction in this case and reverse judgment of conviction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp.
900 F.2d 686 (Third Circuit, 1990)
People v. Sexton
104 A.D.2d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Bertino
93 A.D.2d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Robinson
97 Misc. 2d 47 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Morgan
86 Misc. 377 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1976)
People v. Leyva
341 N.E.2d 546 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
414 U.S. 948, 94 S. Ct. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkpatrick-v-new-york-scotus-1973.