Kirkpatrick v. New York
414 U.S. 948, 94 S. Ct. 283
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 23, 1973·No. No. 73-104·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinions
Appeal from Ct. App. N. Y. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., [949] dissenting)), would note probable jurisdiction in this case and reverse judgment of conviction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kirkpatrick v. New York, 414 U.S. 948, 94 S. Ct. 283 (1973).
414 U.S. 948 (Kirkpatrick v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp.
900 F.2d 686 (Third Circuit, 1990)
People v. Sexton
104 A.D.2d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Bertino
93 A.D.2d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Robinson
97 Misc. 2d 47 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Morgan
86 Misc. 377 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1976)
People v. Leyva
341 N.E.2d 546 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)