Kirkpatrick v. Monroe
This text of 234 Ill. App. 213 (Kirkpatrick v. Monroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal taken by the appellant, Frances Kirkpatrick, from the order of the circuit court of Adams county - sustaining a demurrer to a secondly amended declaration, charging the appellee, Floyd W. Monroe, with slander.
The declaration shows upon its face that the appellant’s right to bring an action for alleged slander is barred by limitation. Section 13 of the Limitation Act provides that: ‘ ‘Actions for slander or libel shall be commenced within one year next after the cause of action accrued.” Section 13, ch. 83, Cahill’s Ill. St.
When it appears from the face of a declaration that the cause of action is barred by limitation, the question may be raised on demurrer. People v. Boyd, 132 Ill. 60; People v. Strauss, 97 Ill. App. 47.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 Ill. App. 213, 1924 Ill. App. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkpatrick-v-monroe-illappct-1924.