Kirkpatrick v. Huff

351 S.W.3d 782, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111, 2011 WL 3802154
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 2011·No. WD 72244·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kevin and Kathy Kirkpatrick sued William and Margaret Huff for violation of restrictive covenants protecting the Kirk-patricks’ view of the Lake of the Ozarks from their lakefront residential property in Gravois Mills. They sought both injunc-tive relief in the form of removal of the offending portions of the Huffs’ neighboring home, as well as damages. The circuit court entered judgment for the Huffs following a bench trial, finding that the Huffs’ newly-constructed home did not violate the relevant restrictive covenants. The Kirkpatricks appeal. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkpatrick v. Huff, 351 S.W.3d 782, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1111, 2011 WL 3802154 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

351 S.W.3d 782 (Kirkpatrick v. Huff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.