Kirkpatrick v. Hopkins
2 Miles 277
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
DecidedDecember 22, 1838
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 2 Miles 277 (Kirkpatrick v. Hopkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kirkpatrick v. Hopkins, 2 Miles 277 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1838).
Opinion
the defendant had complied with the requisitions of the act of Congress, we should entertain this application favourably. But he has not complied in two particulars. The petition is not signed by him, nor “ at the time of entering his appearance,” did he offer the surety required by the act. See 2 Troubat and Haly 533.
Rule discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shaft v. . Phoenix Mutual Life Ins. Co.
67 N.Y. 544 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)
Best v. New York Life Ins.
2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 329 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1872)
Fisk v. Union Pacific Railroad
10 Abb. Pr. 457 (S.D. New York, 1871)
Robinson v. Potter
43 N.H. 188 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1861)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Miles 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkpatrick-v-hopkins-pactcomplphilad-1838.