Kirkpatrick v. County of Washoe
813 F.3d 1258, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2661, 2016 WL 736804
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 17, 2016
DocketNo. 12-15080; D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00600-ECR-VPC
StatusPublished
This text of 813 F.3d 1258 (Kirkpatrick v. County of Washoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kirkpatrick v. County of Washoe, 813 F.3d 1258, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2661, 2016 WL 736804 (9th Cir. 2016).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this ease be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed[1259]*1259eral Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
813 F.3d 1258, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2661, 2016 WL 736804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkpatrick-v-county-of-washoe-ca9-2016.