Kirkpatrick (Ephraim) v. State, Dep't of Corr.
This text of Kirkpatrick (Ephraim) v. State, Dep't of Corr. (Kirkpatrick (Ephraim) v. State, Dep't of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OrTHE STATE OF NEVADA
EPHRAIM KIRKPATRICK, No. 74606 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; AND HAROLD WICKHAM, WARDEN, ELIZABETH A. I3ROWN Respondents. CLERK OF ''UPRELE COURT BY • DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge. Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order does not resolve all claims raised in the petition. Thus, it does not appear that the order is a final order. See Sandstrom v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 121 Nev. 657, 659, 119 P.3d 1250, 1252 (2005) (explaining that a final order disposes of all issues and leaves nothing for future consideration). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
/1_,tisLat ;
Gibbonws Hardesty
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ce 40138 111111FITT cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Ephraim Kirkpatrick Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kirkpatrick (Ephraim) v. State, Dep't of Corr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkpatrick-ephraim-v-state-dept-of-corr-nev-2018.