Kirkpatrick (Ephraim) v. State, Dep't of Corr.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OrTHE STATE OF NEVADA
EPHRAIM KIRKPATRICK, No. 74606 Appellant, vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; AND HAROLD WICKHAM, WARDEN, ELIZABETH A. I3ROWN Respondents. CLERK OF ''UPRELE COURT BY • DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge.
Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.
Specifically, the order does not resolve all claims raised in the petition. Thus, it does not appear that the order is a final order. See Sandstrom v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 121 Nev. 657, 659, 119 P.3d 1250, 1252 (2005) (explaining that a final order disposes of all issues and leaves nothing for future consideration). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
/1_,tisLat ;
Gibbonws Hardesty
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ce 40138 111111FITT cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Ephraim Kirkpatrick Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kirkpatrick (Ephraim) v. State, Dep't of Corr. (Kirkpatrick (Ephraim) v. State, Dep't of Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.