Kirkness v. Honeywell International, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedMarch 27, 2023
Docket3:22-cv-00511
StatusUnknown

This text of Kirkness v. Honeywell International, Inc. (Kirkness v. Honeywell International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirkness v. Honeywell International, Inc., (D. Nev. 2023).

Opinion

1 WILLIAM J. GEDDES Nevada Bar No. 6984 2 THE GEDDES LAW FIRM, P.C. 1575 Delucchi Lane, Suite 206 3 Reno, Nevada 89502 Phone: (775) 853-9455 4 Fax: (775) 299-5337 Email: Will@TheGeddesLawFirm.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Anthony Kirkness 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 ANTHONY KIRKNESS, CASE NO. 3:22-CV-00511-LRH-CLB 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Regarding 12 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. D/B/A/ HONEYWELL INTELLIGRATED, CONFIDENTIALITY OF DOCUMENTS 13 PRODUCED IN LITIGATION Defendant. 14 15 Pursuant to Federal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 26(f) and 16 U.S. District Court of Nevada Rule (“Local Rule”) 26-1(e), the parties through their respective counsel, 17 hereby submit the following Stipulated Protective Order. 18 I. RECITALS 19 WHEREAS: the parties to the above-captioned litigation anticipate that discovery will require 20 the parties to disclose records and information that are confidential and sensitive, including because 21 such records are anticipated to include the parties’ private employment records and private medical 22 records; and 23 WHEREAS: the parties seek to protect and prevent the improper dissemination of such 24 confidential and private records and information to third parties, during the course of litigation and after 25 the litigation has ended; 26 II. STIPLUATION 27 THEREFORE: the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate 28 and request the Court issue an Order (“Stipulated Protective Order”), protecting the confidential nature 1 of certain records and information as may be produced during the course of the above-captioned matter, 2 as follows: 3 1. If any person or entity, whether or not a party to the instant action, produces or receives 4 answers to interrogatories, or documents or other things, which the producing or receiving person or 5 entity considers to be “Confidential Information,” as defined in § II(3)(A)(I) infra; or 6 2. If there is deposition testimony which any person or entity, whether or not a party to the 7 instant action, believes contains “Confidential Information,” as defined in § II(3)(A)(I) infra; or 8 3. Third parties produce information which the third parties assert is confidential, the 9 following procedure shall govern pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 26(c) 10 et. seq.: 11 A. Any documents (and the contents thereof), things or information falling within 12 the definition of “Confidential Information,” set forth in § II(3)(A)(I) infra, that are produced may be 13 designated and marked, in whole or in part, without regard to whether redactions are made, 14 “Confidential” by the party producing the documents or information, at the time the documents are 15 delivered to or made available for inspection by any party; 16 I. “Confidential Information” includes, but is not limited to: (a) 17 employment records of any employees or former employees of any party; (b) confidential notes, 18 memoranda, and statements regarding non-party employees; (c) confidential information concerning 19 the discipline and/or termination of non-party employees and former employees; (d) the production of 20 information or documents proprietary to any party, including by way of example and not limitation, tax 21 records and financial statements; (e) other private information of any party or non-party to the present 22 litigation, including consumer records, e.g., phone bills; (f) financial records and business records of 23 any person or entity, whether a party or non-party to the present litigation; and (g) medical records, 24 including medical bills and psychological records, and medical information of any person, whether a 25 party or non-party to the present litigation. 26 B. If a party produces to another party items that contain Confidential Information 27 as defined above, that party may designate one or more documents, or a portion of a document, as 28 “Confidential” before producing that document to the other party. Such designation shall be made by 1 marking, stamping or typing the word “Confidential” on each page of the document at the time it is 2 produced to the receiving party’s counsel; 3 C. Any party may designate deposition testimony as “Confidential” by orally 4 making such a designation on the record either at the commencement of the deposition, at the time the 5 testimony is given, and/or before the end of that day's questioning. Following such a designation, the 6 court reporter shall mark “Confidential” on the transcript or the portion thereof containing the 7 “Confidential” testimony; 8 D. In addition, documents or items produced by one party may be designated 9 “Confidential” by the other party, i.e., the receiving party, by: 10 I. marking the document, in whole or in part, “Confidential” in the same 11 manner as stated above; and 12 II. then forwarding a copy of the marked document back to the producing 13 party; 14 E. In this regard, the receiving party seeking the “Confidential” designation may 15 designate, by number, each document it believes should be “Confidential”; 16 F. If the receiving party has no objection to the “Confidential” designation made by 17 the producing party, the receiving party may either expressly notify the producing party or allow the 18 fourteen (14) calendar-day objection period (set forth below) to lapse. Where there has been no written 19 objection made, once a document or item has been produced and designated as provided herein to the 20 receiving party, the document or item shall be treated as “Confidential,” respectively, pursuant to this 21 Stipulated Protective Order, until further order of the Court; 22 4. The following protocol shall apply in the event of an objection to a designation of 23 “Confidential”: 24 A. If there is an objection to the “Confidential” designation, the party so objecting 25 must notify the other party in writing of both the objection and the grounds for the objection (the 26 “Designation Objections”), within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date the designation was made 27 or the document(s)/item(s) received, whichever is later, and the procedure in § II(4)(B) infra, shall 28 apply; 1 B. Counsel for the designating party shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of the 2 written Designation Objections to either: (a) agree in writing to de-designate the items pursuant to any 3 and all of the Designation Objections; or (b) file a motion with the Court seeking to uphold any and all 4 designations on items addressed by the Designation Objections (the “Designation Motion”). Pending a 5 resolution of the Designation Motion by the Court, any and all designations of items at issue in such 6 Motion shall remain in place. The designating party shall have the burden on any Designation Motion 7 of establishing the applicability of its designation. If the Designation Objections are neither timely 8 agreed to nor timely addressed in the Designation Motion, then such items shall be de-designated in 9 accordance with the Designation Objection applicable to such items. 10 5. A document or testimony, or portion, summary, or abstract thereof, that is to be treated 11 “Confidential” pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order shall not be disclosed to any persons other 12 than the parties, counsel of record for the parties, attorneys, in-house counsel, legal assistants and 13 clerical personnel employed by them, and other persons to whom disclosure is necessary for the 14 purposes of this litigation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kirkness v. Honeywell International, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkness-v-honeywell-international-inc-nvd-2023.