Kirkman v. Willard

129 S.E.2d 895, 259 N.C. 135, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 495
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 20, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 129 S.E.2d 895 (Kirkman v. Willard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirkman v. Willard, 129 S.E.2d 895, 259 N.C. 135, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 495 (N.C. 1963).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court properly overruled defendant’s motion -for nonsuit. When considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff the evidence presented issues of fact for jury determination. The assignments of error based -on exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence do not disclose error sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Penland v. Greene
221 S.E.2d 365 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 S.E.2d 895, 259 N.C. 135, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkman-v-willard-nc-1963.