Kirkman v. Willard
129 S.E.2d 895, 259 N.C. 135, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 495
Opinion
The court properly overruled defendant’s motion -for nonsuit. When considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff the evidence presented issues of fact for jury determination. The assignments of error based -on exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence do not disclose error sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kirkman v. Willard, 129 S.E.2d 895, 259 N.C. 135, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 495 (N.C. 1963).
129 S.E.2d 895 (Kirkman v. Willard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Penland v. Greene
221 S.E.2d 365 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1976)