Kirkman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kirkman v. State

795 So. 2d 269, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13729, 2001 WL 1159583

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 2, 2001

DocketNo. 1D01-908

StatusPublished

This text of 795 So. 2d 269 (Kirkman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirkman v. State, 795 So. 2d 269, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13729, 2001 WL 1159583 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges a Baker Act order of involuntary placement for treatment pursuant to section 394.467, Florida Statutes. As the appellant asserts, the record evidence does not establish the necessary criteria under section 394.467(l)(a)2; there was no showing that the appellant is likely to suffer from neglect or a refusal to care for himself, and the testimony did not demonstrate a substantial likelihood that the appellant would inflict serious bodily harm on himself or another. See Boller v. State, 775 So.2d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Blue v. State, 764 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The appealed order is therefore reversed.

ALLEN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges a Baker Act order of involuntary placement for treatment pursuant to section 394.467, Florida Statutes. As the appellant asserts, the record evidence does not establish the necessary criteria under section 394.467(l)(a)2; there was no showing that the appellant is likely to suffer from neglect or a refusal to care for himself, and the testimony did not demonstrate a substantial likelihood that the appellant would inflict serious bodily harm on himself or another. See Boller v. State, 775 So.2d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Blue v. State, 764 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The appealed order is therefore reversed.

ALLEN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

795 So. 2d 269, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13729, 2001 WL 1159583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkman-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack