Kirkman v. Kirkman
259 S.E.2d 300, 298 N.C. 297, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1588
This text of 259 S.E.2d 300 (Kirkman v. Kirkman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kirkman v. Kirkman, 259 S.E.2d 300, 298 N.C. 297, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1588 (N.C. 1979).
Opinion
John C. KIRKMAN, Jr., Thomas L. Kirkman and Lina Kirkman Hamilton
v.
Minnie H. KIRKMAN.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nancy Fields Fadum, for plaintiffs.
Randall, Yaeger & Woodson, E. C. Harris, for defendant.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31. 42 N.C.App. 173, 256 S.E.2d 264. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kirkman v. Kirkman
256 S.E.2d 264 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
259 S.E.2d 300, 298 N.C. 297, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkman-v-kirkman-nc-1979.