Kirkman v. Hendrick

Texas Supreme Court

Kirkman v. Hendrick

8 Tex. 253

DecidedJuly 1, 1852

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Tex. 253 (Kirkman v. Hendrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirkman v. Hendrick, 8 Tex. 253 (Tex. 1852).

Pincite

Opinion

Hemphill, Oír. J.

Títere is no error in the judgment of the court. The suit ua-> barred by tlie 4th section of the act of June 2Sth, 1845. (Art. 2399, I >ig.) The judgment being of more than two years’ standing, suit should have been brought within six months after the passage of the statute. (Robinson v. Peyton, 4 Tex. R., and Pryor v. The Administrators of G. Moore, decided at tliis term.)

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hemphill, Oír. J.

Títere is no error in the judgment of the court. The suit ua-> barred by tlie 4th section of the act of June 2Sth, 1845. (Art. 2399, I >ig.) The judgment being of more than two years’ standing, suit should have been brought within six months after the passage of the statute. (Robinson v. Peyton, 4 Tex. R., and Pryor v. The Administrators of G. Moore, decided at tliis term.)

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Tex. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkman-v-hendrick-tex-1852.