Kirkman v. Allen
This text of 17 Ind. 216 (Kirkman v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Suit by Allen against Kirkman, upon a promissory note made by the latter to the former. Judgment lor the plaintiff.
The only question properly raised in the record, relates to the ruling of the Court upon a demurrer to the defendant’s answer.
The answer avers, in substance, that the plaintiff is not a resident of Indiana, but of some one of the New fin'fand States; which one, however, the defendant has never known; that the defendant did not, before the commencement of [217]*217the suit, know where the note could be found, that he might pay it; that the plaintiff' made no demand on the defendant, nor did he inform him where the note could be found, or the money paid; that the defendant has always been ready and walling to pay, upon demand, or upon being informed where the note could be paid. Prayer for judgment for costs.
The demurrer was correctly sustained to this answer.
The j udgment below is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Ind. 216, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkman-v-allen-ind-1861.