Kirkland v. State

750 So. 2d 721, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 437, 2000 WL 51823
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 2000·No. No. 1D98-4376·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Waymon Kirkland challenges an order summarily denying his motion to withdraw his plea of no contest. While the claim that appellant’s plea was coerced as a result of a threat by prosecutor to pursue an additional charge is sufficiently refuted by the plea colloquy contained in the record, appellant’s claim that his plea was involuntary given his mental state and given the allegedly erroneous advice as to amount of time he would serve is not refuted by the record. Accordingly, the order summarily denying relief is REVERSED and REMANDED for an evidentiary hearing consistent with this opinion. See Eccleston v. State, 706 So.2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

KAHN and BENTON, JJ., and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkland v. State, 750 So. 2d 721, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 437, 2000 WL 51823 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

750 So. 2d 721 (Kirkland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eccleston v. State
706 So. 2d 368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)