Kirkland v. State

666 So. 2d 185, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12884, 1995 WL 739699
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kirkland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 633 So. 2d 1138
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1995·No. No. 94-04575·Published

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

Willie Otis Kirkland appeals the denial of his motion to suppress and the imposition of certain court costs, attorney’s fees, and probation conditions. We affirm the denial of the motion to suppress and the imposition of the court costs, the costs of prosecution, and the assessed attorney’s fees. We strike the conditions of probation that prohibit the possession of weapons and the excessive use of alcohol. We also strike the condition of probation that requires Kirkland to pay for drug and alcohol abuse evaluation, treatment and random testing. The conditions are stricken because they should have been, and were not, orally pronounced at sentencing. See Malone v. State, 652 So.2d 902 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Judgment and sentence affirmed; conditions of probation stricken.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkland v. State, 666 So. 2d 185, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12884, 1995 WL 739699 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

666 So. 2d 185 (Kirkland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malone v. State
652 So. 2d 902 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)