Kirkland v. State

511 So. 2d 441, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2025, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9958
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 19, 1987
DocketNo. BP-132
StatusPublished

This text of 511 So. 2d 441 (Kirkland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirkland v. State, 511 So. 2d 441, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2025, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9958 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

SHIVERS, Judge.

Appellant, Waymon Kirkland, appeals from a conviction of sexual battery with slight force. We address the issue of whether the trial court erred when it imposed $200 in court costs against Kirkland, who was indigent at the time of his conviction. We reverse.

On July 1, 1986, a jury convicted Kirkland of sexual battery with the use of force not likely to cause serious personal injury. Kirkland was sentenced to nine years in state prison followed by six years of probation. At the sentencing phase of Kirkland’s trial, the court assessed $200 in court costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985).

The State concedes that the trial court erred in its assessment of court costs against Kirkland in light of his indigent status. In Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), we considered the issue of whether section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), was intended to impose additional court costs on non-indigent persons only. This court answered that question in the affirmative and reversed the trial court’s imposition of such costs on two insolvent defendants after observing:

The language of this statute is clear and leads to only one meaning: indigency is to be determined at the time of sentencing and those persons found to be indigent must be ordered to serve a term of community service in lieu of the imposition of additional court costs. Noland v. State, 489 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Lawton, 492 So.2d at 406. We therefore reverse and remand so that Kirkland may be ordered to serve a term of community service “in lieu of the imposition of additional court costs.” Id. We have examined the other issues which Kirkland has raised in this appeal, and find them to be without merit.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawton v. State
492 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Noland v. State
489 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 So. 2d 441, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2025, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkland-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.