Kirkland v. Kirkland

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kirkland v. Kirkland

153 So. 3d 942, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19304, 2014 WL 6612095

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 24, 2014

DocketNo. 1D14-4917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 153 So. 3d 942 (Kirkland v. Kirkland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirkland v. Kirkland, 153 So. 3d 942, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19304, 2014 WL 6612095 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has sought review of the lower tribunal’s August 19, 2014, Order Denying Former Husband’s Supplemental Petition to Modify Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of October 29, 2014, the Court has determined that the order is a non-final order as it reserves jurisdiction and contemplates the exercise of additional judicial labor with regard to the issue of child support. Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Klein v. Klein, 551 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

LEWIS, C. J., THOMAS and OSTERHAUS, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has sought review of the lower tribunal’s August 19, 2014, Order Denying Former Husband’s Supplemental Petition to Modify Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of October 29, 2014, the Court has determined that the order is a non-final order as it reserves jurisdiction and contemplates the exercise of additional judicial labor with regard to the issue of child support. Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Klein v. Klein, 551 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

LEWIS, C. J., THOMAS and OSTERHAUS, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 So. 3d 942, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19304, 2014 WL 6612095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkland-v-kirkland-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack