Kirkland v. Citizens Trust Co.

91 S.E. 254, 19 Ga. App. 133, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 20
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 23, 1917
Docket7618
StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.E. 254 (Kirkland v. Citizens Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirkland v. Citizens Trust Co., 91 S.E. 254, 19 Ga. App. 133, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 20 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

George, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

1. The amendment was properly allowed by the court. Neal Bank v. Bruce, 137 Ga. 361 (73 S. E. 503); Gelders v. Kennedy, 9 Ga. App. 389 (71 S. E. 503); Toole v. Cook, 15 Ga. App. 133 (82 S. E. 772).

[135]*1352. The court properly entered judgment for attorney’s fees, the notices served upon the defendant fully describing the notes upon which suit was brought, and expressly alleging that Ferris, Lewis, and Fuller were the “present holders” of the same. The point raised as'to the notice was expressly ruled upon in Gelders v. Kennedy, and Toole v. Cook, supra.

There is a motion in this case to assess damages for delay, and we think that the motion is meritorious. Damages are therefore awarded in favor of the defendant in error and against the plaintiff in error in terms of the statute.

■Judgment affirmed, with damages.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neal Bank v. Bruce
73 S.E. 503 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Gelders v. Kennedy
71 S.E. 503 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Toole v. Cook
82 S.E. 772 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 254, 19 Ga. App. 133, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkland-v-citizens-trust-co-gactapp-1917.