Kirkiles & Kotiadis v. Twin Donut, Inc.
This text of 60 A.D.3d 430 (Kirkiles & Kotiadis v. Twin Donut, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order, Supreme Court, [431]*431New York County (Leland G. DeGrasse, J.), entered March 21, 2008, which denied defendants’ motion to correct and resettle a judgment entered February 27, 2004, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Defendants have not sought to set aside the parties’ stipulation of settlement, which superseded the subject judgment. In any event, the record presents no basis therefor (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]).
We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.3d 430, 873 N.Y.S.2d 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkiles-kotiadis-v-twin-donut-inc-nyappdiv-2009.