Kirkham v. Fox
19 Johns. 126
This text of 19 Johns. 126 (Kirkham v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kirkham v. Fox, 19 Johns. 126 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1821).
Opinion
There is no contradiction in the cases cited. If the defendant was held to bail in the Court below, the plaintiff is entitled to bail, on its removal here ; and though no bail should be required, in the Court below, yet the plaintiff may insist upon special bail in this Court. The motion must be denied.
Motion denied.
Vide 1 Dunlap’s Pr. 224.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 Johns. 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkham-v-fox-nysupct-1821.