Kirkel v. City of New York
This text of 236 A.D. 701 (Kirkel v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and complaint dismissed, with costs. The notice of intention to commence the action served upon the corporation counsel, [702]*702pursuant to chapter 572 of the Laws of 1886, failed to describe sufficiently and definitely the place of accident, and, therefore, does not comply with the statute. (Casey v. City of New York, 217 N. Y. 192; Purdy v. City of New York, 193 id. 521; Tynan v. City of New York, 223 id. 596; Kroin v. City of New York, 177 App. Div. 738.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, J.J., concur. ”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkel-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1931.