Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Kirkaldy v. RIM

Kirkaldy v. RIM

689 N.W.2d 227, 471 Mich. 927
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kirkaldy v. RIM. Read the opinion of the Court — 478 Mich. 581 →
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 29, 2004·No. 122029·Published

Opinion

689 N.W.2d 227 (2004)

KIRKALDY
v.
RIM

No. 122029.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 29, 2004.

SC: 122029, COA: 225735.

By order of May 22, 2003, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decisions in Grossman v. Brown (Docket No. 122458) and Halloran v. Bhan (Docket No. 121523). On order of the Court, the opinions having been issued on July 20, 2004, 470 Mich. 593, 685 N.W.2d 198 (2004), and 470 Mich. 572, 683 N.W.2d 129 (2004), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant *228 leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkaldy v. RIM, 689 N.W.2d 227, 471 Mich. 927 (Mich. 2004).

689 N.W.2d 227 (Kirkaldy v. RIM) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grossman v. Brown
685 N.W.2d 198 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2004)
Halloran v. Bhan
683 N.W.2d 129 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2004)