Kirk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Kirk v. State

1926 OK CR 307, 248 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 114, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 310

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 14, 1926

DocketNo. A-5506.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 307 (Kirk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirk v. State, 1926 OK CR 307, 248 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 114, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 310 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sam Kirk, plaintiff in error, was in the county court of Comanche county found guilty of transporting intoxicating liquor, with his punishment assessed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days. The plaintiff in error has filed no brief in support of his appeal. An examination of the record shows that the information and the evidence supporting it were sufficient to sustain the conviction. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sam Kirk, plaintiff in error, was in the county court of Comanche county found guilty of transporting intoxicating liquor, with his punishment assessed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days. The plaintiff in error has filed no brief in support of his appeal. An examination of the record shows that the information and the evidence supporting it were sufficient to sustain the conviction. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 307, 248 P. 1119, 35 Okla. Crim. 114, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirk-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.