Kirk v. State
521 So. 2d 340, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 675, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 959, 1988 WL 20045
This text of 521 So. 2d 340 (Kirk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kirk v. State, 521 So. 2d 340, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 675, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 959, 1988 WL 20045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
Appellant’s judgment and sentence is affirmed, however, we strike the costs imposed without benefit of notice and hearing. The state may seek reimposition of those costs after appropriate notice and hearing. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Dilla v. State, 508 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Dominguez v. State
508 So. 2d 1316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
521 So. 2d 340, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 675, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 959, 1988 WL 20045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirk-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.