Kirk v. State
521 So. 2d 340, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 675, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 959, 1988 WL 20045
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kirk v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1858 →
Opinion
Appellant’s judgment and sentence is affirmed, however, we strike the costs imposed without benefit of notice and hearing. The state may seek reimposition of those costs after appropriate notice and hearing. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Dilla v. State, 508 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kirk v. State, 521 So. 2d 340, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 675, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 959, 1988 WL 20045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
521 So. 2d 340 (Kirk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Dominguez v. State
508 So. 2d 1316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)