Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

51 F.3d 1220, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12529
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 F.3d 147
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 24, 1995·No. 94-1745·Published

Opinion

51 F.3d 1220

Sarah A. KIRK, Administratrix of the Estates of Kirk, Alfred
T., Deceased and Kirk, Sarah A. in her own right
v.
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.; Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.;
Keene Corporation; Garlock Inc.; Owens-Corning Fiberglas
Corporation; Celotex Corp.; GAF Corporation;
Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Owens-Corning Fiberglas
Corporation, Appellant.

Nos. 94-1745, 94-1746.

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Decided May 24, 1995.

Before: STAPLETON, GREENBERG and COWEN, Circuit Judges.

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and all judges who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is granted. The panel opinion is hereby vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 51 F.3d 1220, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 12529 (3d Cir. 1995).

51 F.3d 1220 (Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.