Kirk v. Great American Ins.

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided November 20, 2000·No. I.C. No. 628621.·Published

Opinion

In reviewing plaintiffs motion, the Full Commission notes that contrary to plaintiffs contention, the ten percent (10%) penalty provision of G.S. 97-18(g) is not mandatory, as shown by the language ". . . unless such nonpayment is excused by the Commission . . . G.S. 97-18(g). Plaintiff is correct, however, regarding the mandatory nature of the interest provisions in G.S. 97-86.2. Furthermore, interest owed under this provision that is overdue may be subject to the penalty provision in G.S. 97-18(g).

At present, there is insufficient evidence or relevant documentation upon which to find that any payments of compensation or interest pursuant to G.S. 97-86.2 are overdue and therefore subject to the penalty provisions of G.S. 97-18(g). Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion is hereby DENIED.

No additional costs are assessed.

S/_______________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/_______________ RENÉE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirk v. Great American Ins., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2000).

Kirk v. Great American Ins. (Kirk v. Great American Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.