Home/Supreme Court/Kirk v. Gong

Kirk v. Gong

389 U.S. 574
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 15, 1968
Docket872
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 389 U.S. 574 (Kirk v. Gong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirk v. Gong, 389 U.S. 574 (1968).

Opinion

389 U.S. 574 (1968)

KIRK, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
v.
GONG ET AL.

No. 872.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 15, 1968.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and T. T. Turnbull and Robert A. Chastain, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

Thomas C. Britton, Stuart Simon, D. P. S. Paul and P. D. Thomson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinions of the Justices To the Governor
282 N.E.2d 629 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1972)
(1971)
60 Op. Att'y Gen. 397 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1971)
Kirkpatrick v. Preisler
394 U.S. 526 (Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 U.S. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirk-v-gong-scotus-1968.