Kirk v. Curran

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7567

KAREEM A. KIRK,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MARTHA CURRAN; KELLY MILLER; TONYA BROOKS,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00301-GCM)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 21, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kareem A. Kirk, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kareem A. Kirk appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kirk v.

Curran, No. 3:09-cv-00301-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED