Kirk M. Foster v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 15, 2019
Docket19-0692
StatusPublished

This text of Kirk M. Foster v. State of Florida (Kirk M. Foster v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirk M. Foster v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D19-0692 _____________________________

KIRK M. FOSTER,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

March 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, RAY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Kirk M. Foster, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kirk M. Foster v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirk-m-foster-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.