Kirk Koether and Vicki Koether v. Amber Novasad-White, Individually and D/B/A/ Nova Tech Foundation Repair, and John Novosad, Individually and D/B/A Nova Tech Foundation Repair

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 28, 2015·No. 03-15-00046-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 28, 2015

NO. 03-15-00046-CV

Kirk Koether and Vicki Koether, Appellants

v.

Amber Novasad-White, Individually and d/b/a/ Nova Tech Foundation Repair, and John Novosad, Individually and d/b/a Nova Tech Foundation Repair, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on December 18, 2014. Having

reviewed the record, the Court holds that Kirk Koether and Vicki Koether have not prosecuted

their appeal and did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellants shall pay all costs relating to this

appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirk Koether and Vicki Koether v. Amber Novasad-White, Individually and D/B/A/ Nova Tech Foundation Repair, and John Novosad, Individually and D/B/A Nova Tech Foundation Repair, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Kirk Koether and Vicki Koether v. Amber Novasad-White, Individually and D/B/A/ Nova Tech Foundation Repair, and John Novosad, Individually and D/B/A Nova Tech Foundation Repair (Kirk Koether and Vicki Koether v. Amber Novasad-White, Individually and D/B/A/ Nova Tech Foundation Repair, and John Novosad, Individually and D/B/A Nova Tech Foundation Repair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.