Kirk DeWayne McClain v. the State of Texas
This text of Kirk DeWayne McClain v. the State of Texas (Kirk DeWayne McClain v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-24-00058-CR
KIRK DEWAYNE MCCLAIN, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 100th District Court Childress County, Texas Trial Court No. 6736, Honorable Dale A. Rabe, Presiding
May 21, 2024 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.
Appellant, Kirk DeWayne McClain, appeals from the trial court’s judgment
adjudicating him guilty of aggravated sexual assault 1 and sentencing him to eighty years
in prison. The appellate record was originally due April 16, 2024, but the reporter’s record
has yet to be filed. By letter of April 24, 2024, we notified the reporter that it was overdue
and directed her to advise us of the status of same by May 6, 2024. Despite that, the
court received no communication.
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021. Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly
responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring
appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to
preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand,
the trial court shall determine the following:
(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;
(2) why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;
(3) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those tasks; and
(4) whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds reasonable.
Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days
to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter
to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by June 11,
2024.
Should the reporter file the record on or before June 11, 2024, she is directed to
immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not
be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kirk DeWayne McClain v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirk-dewayne-mcclain-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.