Kirk A. Kennedy v. Epstein Becker & Green P.C., Epstein, Becker, Green, Wicklife, & Hall P.C., and Stephen R. Cochell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Kirk A. Kennedy v. Epstein Becker & Green P.C., Epstein, Becker, Green, Wicklife, & Hall P.C., and Stephen R. Cochell

DecidedJanuary 14, 2016

Docket01-15-00706-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Kirk A. Kennedy v. Epstein Becker & Green P.C., Epstein, Becker, Green, Wicklife, & Hall P.C., and Stephen R. Cochell (Kirk A. Kennedy v. Epstein Becker & Green P.C., Epstein, Becker, Green, Wicklife, & Hall P.C., and Stephen R. Cochell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirk A. Kennedy v. Epstein Becker & Green P.C., Epstein, Becker, Green, Wicklife, & Hall P.C., and Stephen R. Cochell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion issued January 14, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00706-CV ——————————— KIRK A. KENNEDY, Appellant V. EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C., EPSTEIN, BECKER, GREEN, WICKLIFE & HALL P.C., AND STEPHEN R. COCHELL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2013-61197

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kirk A. Kennedy, representing that the parties have settled the

underlying lawsuit, has filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal with prejudice. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI