Kirk A. Kennedy v. Epstein Becker & Green P.C., Epstein, Becker, Green, Wicklife, & Hall P.C., and Stephen R. Cochell

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 14, 2016·No. 01-15-00706-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued January 14, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

prejudice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal with prejudice. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Bland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirk A. Kennedy v. Epstein Becker & Green P.C., Epstein, Becker, Green, Wicklife, & Hall P.C., and Stephen R. Cochell, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Kirk A. Kennedy v. Epstein Becker & Green P.C., Epstein, Becker, Green, Wicklife, & Hall P.C., and Stephen R. Cochell (Kirk A. Kennedy v. Epstein Becker & Green P.C., Epstein, Becker, Green, Wicklife, & Hall P.C., and Stephen R. Cochell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.