Kirilov v. Angelich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kirilov v. Angelich

33 A.D.2d 572, 305 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3090

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 572 (Kirilov v. Angelich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirilov v. Angelich, 33 A.D.2d 572, 305 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered August 26, 1969, which denied her motion for an immediate trial preference. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, in the exercise of discretion and in ths> interests of justice, [573]*573without costs, and motion granted, on condition that- plaintiff submit to a pretrial physical examination should defendants demand one. In view of the peculiar circumstances presented herein, the interests of justice would be served by the granting of an immediate trial preference to plaintiff; and the- denial of that relief was an improvident exercise of discretion. Brennan, Acting P. - J.,' Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injury, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered August 26, 1969, which denied her motion for an immediate trial preference. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, in the exercise of discretion and in ths> interests of justice, [573]*573without costs, and motion granted, on condition that- plaintiff submit to a pretrial physical examination should defendants demand one. In view of the peculiar circumstances presented herein, the interests of justice would be served by the granting of an immediate trial preference to plaintiff; and the- denial of that relief was an improvident exercise of discretion. Brennan, Acting P. - J.,' Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 572, 305 N.Y.S.2d 681, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirilov-v-angelich-nyappdiv-1969.