Kirchoff v. Board of County Commissioners

248 N.W. 817, 189 Minn. 226, 1933 Minn. LEXIS 764
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 9, 1933
DocketNo. 29,330.
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 248 N.W. 817 (Kirchoff v. Board of County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirchoff v. Board of County Commissioners, 248 N.W. 817, 189 Minn. 226, 1933 Minn. LEXIS 764 (Mich. 1933).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is by the county board of McLeod county from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The case is that of a freeholder petitioning the county board to have his land set off from one school district and attached to another. The county board, *227 after hearing, denied the petition. The petitioner then appealed to the district court, and that court, after trial, reversed the order of the county hoard. The hoard then moved for a new trial and now appeals to this court.

The county board, prosecuting this appeal, as far as the record shows, has no interest in the litigation and is not an aggrieved party. The board is the tribunal designated by statute to hear the petition and pass upon it in the first instance. The litigants are the petitioner and the school districts affected. A court or tribunal before whom a controversy is litigated has as such no appealable interest in the matter. And, while the county board represents the county in many matters in which the county is interested, it does not appear that the county has any financial or other interest in this litigation, nor is the appeal taken by or in behalf of the county. Public boards and officers cannot appeal or sue out Avrits of error if they have no interest or are not aggrieved either in their official or individual capacity. 3 C. J. p. 658, § 528; Winne v. People, 177 Ill. 268, 52 N. E. 377; Fitch v. Hay, 112 App. Div. 736, 98 N. Y. S. 1090.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minn. Bd. of Health v. Gov., Etc., App. Bd.
230 N.W.2d 176 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1975)
Minnesota Water Resources Board v. County of Traverse
177 N.W.2d 44 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1970)
County School Board v. Cottonwood School District No. 41
137 N.W.2d 882 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1965)
Town of Eagan, Dakota County v. Minnesota Mun. Com'n
130 N.W.2d 525 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1964)
In Re Petition of Minneapolis Area Development Corp.
131 N.W.2d 29 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1964)
In re the Appeal of Chung
352 P.2d 846 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1960)
Re App. C/C Clerk Re Regis. Buda
352 P.2d 846 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1960)
Fairmont Real Estate & Investment Co. v. County of Martin
92 N.W.2d 800 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
In Re Petition of Abel
253 Minn. 452 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
Bricelyn School District No. 132 v. Board of County Commissioners
55 N.W.2d 602 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1952)
State v. Sax
42 N.W.2d 680 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1950)
In Re the Eligibility for Unemployment Benefits of Foy
116 P.2d 545 (Washington Supreme Court, 1941)
Rommell v. Walsh
15 A.2d 6 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1940)
Bowles v. Dannin
2 A.2d 626 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1938)
Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Weiss
253 N.W. 1 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 N.W. 817, 189 Minn. 226, 1933 Minn. LEXIS 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirchoff-v-board-of-county-commissioners-minn-1933.