Kirchner v. Wood

12 N.W. 44, 48 Mich. 199, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 776
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 20, 1882·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Cooley, J.

To the bill in this case the- defendants demurred generally. The court overruled the demurrer, and gave the defendants leave to answer within ten days. They did not answer, and after the ten days had expired^ appealed to this court.

Held, that the order or decree overruling the demurrer was not a final decree, and therefore not appealable under the statute. Whether the defendants did- or did not exercise their right to answer is immaterial on this question. Overruling the demurrer gave no relief to complainant, and decided nothing but the sufficiency of the pleading.

Appeal dismissed.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirchner v. Wood, 12 N.W. 44, 48 Mich. 199, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 776 (Mich. 1882).

12 N.W. 44 (Kirchner v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kuehn v. Kuehn
232 S.W. 918 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Moody v. Macomber
120 N.W. 358 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)
Kerr v. Rupp
107 N.W. 1059 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1906)
Texas Land & Loan Co. v. Winter
57 S.W. 39 (Texas Supreme Court, 1900)
Robinson v. Kunkleman
75 N.W. 451 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)
Barthrop v. Kona Coffee Co.
10 Haw. 398 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1896)
Robinson v. Belt
56 F. 328 (Eighth Circuit, 1893)