Kirchner v. Shooters on the Water, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Kirchner v. Shooters on the Water, Inc.

2009 Ohio 3714, 911 N.E.2d 291, 122 Ohio St. 3d 348

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 4, 2009·No. 2006-1682·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 120, 2009-Ohio-2495, 909 N.E.2d 120.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc. *349 Davis & Young and George W. Lutjen, for appellees Michael Miller, Judith Miller, and Gabrielle Miller. Dennis R. Spirgen, for appellee Sugar Warehouse Limited Partnership.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc., 122 Ohio St.3d 120, 2009-Ohio-2495, 909 N.E.2d 120.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc. *349 Davis & Young and George W. Lutjen, for appellees Michael Miller, Judith Miller, and Gabrielle Miller. Dennis R. Spirgen, for appellee Sugar Warehouse Limited Partnership.

Kirchner v. Shooters on the Water, Inc., 2009 Ohio 3714, 911 N.E.2d 291, 122 Ohio St. 3d 348 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

2009 Ohio 3714 (Kirchner v. Shooters on the Water, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related