Kirchner v. County of Niagara

2017 NY Slip Op 6740

Opinion

Kirchner v County of Niagara (2017 NY Slip Op 06740)

Kirchner v County of Niagara

2017 NY Slip Op 06740

Decided on September 29, 2017

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 29, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND CARNI, JJ.

955 CA 16-01353

[*1]JASON KIRCHNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

COUNTY OF NIAGARA, CLAUDETTE CALDWELL, COUNTY OF ERIE, JAMES J. WOYTASH, M.D., AND UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO PATHOLOGISTS, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

HOGAN WILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (STEVEN M. COHEN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

FELDMAN KIEFFER, LLP, BUFFALO (MATTHEW J. KIBLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS JAMES J. WOYTASH, M.D., AND UNIVERSITY AT

MICHAEL A. SIRAGUSA, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (SHAWN P. HENNESSY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT COUNTY OF ERIE.

GIBSON, MCASKILL & CROSBY, LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. WILLETT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS COUNTY OF NIAGARA AND CLAUDETTE CALDWELL.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Mark Montour, J.), entered April 25, 2016. The order, among other things, denied plaintiff's motion for leave to reargue and/or renew his opposition to the motions of defendants for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Kirchner v County of Niagara ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Sept. 29, 2017]).

Entered: September 29, 2017

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court