Kirchmann v. Kirchmann

Nebraska Supreme Court

Kirchmann v. Kirchmann

464 N.W.2d 800, 237 Neb. 131, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 56

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 25, 1991

DocketNo. 90-425

StatusPublished

This text of 464 N.W.2d 800 (Kirchmann v. Kirchmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirchmann v. Kirchmann, 464 N.W.2d 800, 237 Neb. 131, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 56 (Neb. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action in which respondent husband, Terry A. Kirchmann, has appealed from an order denying his application to modify the divorce decree entered between the parties on July 11, 1988, by removing the physical custody of [132]*132his son from the petitioner-appellee wife, Tina L. Kirchmann. The application to modify was filed September 22, 1989. The trial court found that the appellant had “failed in his burden to show a substantial change of circumstance warranting change of physical custody of the minor child.”

We have examined the record in our de novo review and agree with the findings and order of the trial court. If anything, the situation has improved slightly in that appellee has now married the man with whom she had been living.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action in which respondent husband, Terry A. Kirchmann, has appealed from an order denying his application to modify the divorce decree entered between the parties on July 11, 1988, by removing the physical custody of [132]*132his son from the petitioner-appellee wife, Tina L. Kirchmann. The application to modify was filed September 22, 1989. The trial court found that the appellant had “failed in his burden to show a substantial change of circumstance warranting change of physical custody of the minor child.”

We have examined the record in our de novo review and agree with the findings and order of the trial court. If anything, the situation has improved slightly in that appellee has now married the man with whom she had been living.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

464 N.W.2d 800, 237 Neb. 131, 1991 Neb. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirchmann-v-kirchmann-neb-1991.