Kirchberger v. American Acetylene Burner Co.

Second Circuit

Kirchberger v. American Acetylene Burner Co.

142 F. 169, 73 C.C.A. 387, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4107

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedOctober 31, 1905

DocketNo. 174

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 142 F. 169 (Kirchberger v. American Acetylene Burner Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirchberger v. American Acetylene Burner Co., 142 F. 169, 73 C.C.A. 387, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4107 (2d Cir. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for rehearing filed by the American Acetylene Burner Company through its president, who is the patentee of the Shaffer patents involved in this litigation. The decree was entered on April 2, .1904, during the October, 1903, term, which ended October 17, 1904. A petition for rehearing was filed during said term, and was denied. 132 Fed. 911, 66 C. C. A. 121.

Rule 29 of this court (31 C. C. A. clxvii) provides as follows:

“29. Rehearing. A petition for rehearing after judgment can be presented only at the term at which judgment is entered, unless by special leave granted during the term; and must be printed and briefly and distinctly state its grounds, and be supported by certificate of counsel; and will not be granted, or permitted to be argued, unless a judge who concurred in the judgment desires it, and a majority of the court so determines.”

The time for filing this second petition for rehearing has expired, under said rule, and it, therefore, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI