Kirchberg v. Feenstra

447 U.S. 903, 100 S. Ct. 2983, 64 L. Ed. 2d 852, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 2324
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kirchberg v. Feenstra. Read the opinion of the Court — 446 U.S. 917
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 9, 1980·No. No. 79-1388·Published

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 446 U. S. 917.] Motion of Rudolph R. Schoemann, Esquire, to permit Alan F. Schoen-berger, Esquire, of New Orleans, La., to present oral argument pro hac vice granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 447 U.S. 903, 100 S. Ct. 2983, 64 L. Ed. 2d 852, 1980 U.S. LEXIS 2324 (1980).

447 U.S. 903 (Kirchberg v. Feenstra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.