Kirby v. State

983 S.W.2d 431, 336 Ark. 82, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 19
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 14, 1999
DocketCR 98-1442
StatusPublished

This text of 983 S.W.2d 431 (Kirby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirby v. State, 983 S.W.2d 431, 336 Ark. 82, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 19 (Ark. 1999).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant James Kirby was convicted of aggravated robbery and theft of property on May 13, 1997. No timely appeal was filed by Kirby or his counsel, James O. Clawson. Kirby retained new counsel, Lea Ellen Fowler, after the time to file an appeal and post-conviction relief had expired. On May 12, 1998, Fowler filed a motion for belated appeal. We remand this matter to the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine if Mr. Kirby had requested his trial counsel, James O. Clawson, to file an appeal, and direct the trial court to make its findings and remand them to this court within thirty days. See Sanders v. State, 329 Ark. 571, 950 S.W.2d 220 (1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. State
950 S.W.2d 220 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 S.W.2d 431, 336 Ark. 82, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirby-v-state-ark-1999.