Kirby v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided April 18, 2022·No. 17-782·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Guited States Court of Federal Clanns

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-782V Filed: March 22, 2022 UNPUBLISHED

PAMELA KIRBY, Petitioner, ; V. Joint Stipulation on Damages; Influenza (“Flu”) vaccine; Multiple SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND sclerosis ("MS"); Chronic HUMAN SERVICES Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) Respondent.

Joseph Vuckovich, Maglio Christopher & Toale, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Camille Collett , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION"

On June 12, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,? (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered multiple sclerosis (“MS”) and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (“CIDP”). Petition at 2; Stipulation, filed March 22, 2022, at 4] 4. Petitioner further alleges that she has experienced the residual effects of her condition for more than six months, that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of her condition, and that her vaccine was administered in the United States. Petition at 2; Stipulation at JJ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner's alleged MS and/or CIDP and their residual effects were caused- in-fact by her flu vaccine. Respondent further denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner any other injury or her current condition. ” Stipulation at J] 6.

Nevertheless, on March 22, 2022, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. | find the stipulation

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, it will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. See 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, it will be redacted from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). reasonable and adopt it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, | award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $200,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stipulation at J 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under § 15(a). /d.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. *

ITIS SO ORDERED. s/Daniel T. Horner

Daniel T. Horner Special Master

? Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. DocuSign Envelope ID: D81CEE54-4C90-4206-8A35-896393774434

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) PAMELA KIRBY, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 17-782V V. ) Special Master Horner ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Pamela Kirby (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received her flu immunization on October 7, 2015.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that as a result of receiving the flu vaccine she developed multiple sclerosis (“MS”) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“CIDP”), and experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her condition. DocuSign Envelope ID: 081CEE54-4C90-4206-8A35-8963937 74434

6. Respondent denies that petitioner’s alleged MS and/or CIDP and their residual effects were caused-in-fact by her flu vaccine. Respondent further denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner any other injury or her current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

a lump sum of $200,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42

U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis. DocuSign Envelope ID: D81CEE54-4C90-4206-8A35-896393774434

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirby v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2022).

Kirby v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Kirby v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a