Kirby v. Richmond Redevelopment & Housing Authority

Fourth Circuit

Kirby v. Richmond Redevelopment & Housing Authority

194 F. App'x 105

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 15, 2006·No. No. 05-2292·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kathleen R. Kirby appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kirby v. Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority, No. CA-04-791-REP-MHL (E.D.Va. Sep. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kathleen R. Kirby appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kirby v. Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority, No. CA-04-791-REP-MHL (E.D.Va. Sep. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Kirby v. Richmond Redevelopment & Housing Authority, 194 F. App'x 105 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

194 F. App'x 105 (Kirby v. Richmond Redevelopment & Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.