Kirby v. Lockport Paper Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kirby v. Lockport Paper Co.

104 N.Y.S. 1131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 104 N.Y.S. 1131 (Kirby v. Lockport Paper Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirby v. Lockport Paper Co., 104 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained, and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide the event. Held, that the question as to whether, under the labor law (see Laws 1897, p. 480, c. 415, § 81, as amended by Laws 1904, p. 640, c. 291), the shafting should have been guarded, was a question of fact for the jury, and not one of fact for the court.

McLENNAN, P. j., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained, and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide the event. Held, that the question as to whether, under the labor law (see Laws 1897, p. 480, c. 415, § 81, as amended by Laws 1904, p. 640, c. 291), the shafting should have been guarded, was a question of fact for the jury, and not one of fact for the court.

McLENNAN, P. j., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirby-v-lockport-paper-co-nyappdiv-1906.