Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Kirby v. Lee

Kirby v. Lee

72 A. 1118, 77 N.J.L. 618, 48 Vroom 618, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 186
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 1, 1909
StatusPublished

This text of 72 A. 1118 (Kirby v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirby v. Lee, 72 A. 1118, 77 N.J.L. 618, 48 Vroom 618, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 186 (N.J. 1909).

Opinion

PER CuRIAM.

The judgment of the Supreme Court should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Reed in that court.

For affirmance—The ChaNcellor, Chief Justice, Gar-KISON, SWAYZE, TRENCIIARD, PARKER, MlNTHRN, BOGERT, VhedeNburgii, Vroom, GRAY, Dill, J.J. 12.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A. 1118, 77 N.J.L. 618, 48 Vroom 618, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirby-v-lee-nj-1909.