Kirby v. Kirby

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 736
Ohio Circuit Courts·Decided July 1, 1895·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

We are of the opinion that the record in this case does not show > that in any respect the commissioners appointed to make a partition of 1 the lands held by the parties hereto, as tenants in common, have not ¡ acted in conformity of law or in prejudice of the rights of any of the j parties, or that the testimony taken clearly showed that the partition I made was unfair or unequal. To justify us in holding, it must be man- ! ilest from the evidence that such was the case, and it does not so appear. | The order ot the common pleas court confirming the partition made l will therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirby v. Kirby, 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 736 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1895).

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 736 (Kirby v. Kirby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon v. Underwood
2017 Ohio 2885 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)
McGill v. Roush
621 N.E.2d 865 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1993)