Kirby v. Kirby

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 736
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedJuly 1, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 736 (Kirby v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirby v. Kirby, 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 736 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

Smith, J.

We are of the opinion that the record in this case does not show > that in any respect the commissioners appointed to make a partition of 1 the lands held by the parties hereto, as tenants in common, have not ¡ acted in conformity of law or in prejudice of the rights of any of the j parties, or that the testimony taken clearly showed that the partition I made was unfair or unequal. To justify us in holding, it must be man- ! ilest from the evidence that such was the case, and it does not so appear. | The order ot the common pleas court confirming the partition made l will therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simon v. Underwood
2017 Ohio 2885 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)
McGill v. Roush
621 N.E.2d 865 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirby-v-kirby-ohiocirct-1895.