Kirby v. Harrington
13 P. 218, 2 Cal. Unrep. 740
This text of 13 P. 218 (Kirby v. Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kirby v. Harrington, 13 P. 218, 2 Cal. Unrep. 740 (Cal. 1887).
Opinion
The certificate of the clerk of the superior court is in due form, and the appeal should be dismissed. But the application of respondent for damages on appeal must be denied. We are not authorized to decide an appeal to be frivolous on the ex parte affidavit of respondent that he has been informed and believes it to be without merit: Vaughn v. Werley, 62 Cal. 181.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Vaughn v. Werley
62 Cal. 181 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 P. 218, 2 Cal. Unrep. 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirby-v-harrington-cal-1887.