Kirby v. Genesis Properties & Hunt Investments

Fourth Circuit

Kirby v. Genesis Properties & Hunt Investments

144 F. App'x 330

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 29, 2005·No. No. 05-1525·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kathleen R. Kirby appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kirby v. Genesis Properties & Hunt Investments, CA-04-792 (E.D.Va. Apr. 8, 2005). We dispense [331]*331with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kathleen R. Kirby appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kirby v. Genesis Properties & Hunt Investments, CA-04-792 (E.D.Va. Apr. 8, 2005). We dispense [331]*331with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Kirby v. Genesis Properties & Hunt Investments, 144 F. App'x 330 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

144 F. App'x 330 (Kirby v. Genesis Properties & Hunt Investments) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related