Kirby v. General Electric Co.

20 F. App'x 167
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 9, 2001·No. Nos. 00-1298, 01-1018, 01-1019, 01-1239, 01-1334·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, the Appellants appeal a district court judgment adopting a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation and dismissing their complaint. The Appellants further appeal the district court’s order denying a motion filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and other orders concerning sanctions. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kirby v. General Elec. Co., No. CA-98-70-5-V (W.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2000; Dec. 9, 2000; Feb. 7, 2001; Feb. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirby v. General Electric Co., 20 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2001).

20 F. App'x 167 (Kirby v. General Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related