Kirby v. Collins

32 P. 1060, 6 Wash. 297, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 284
Washington Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 1893·No. No. 811·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

Respondent moves to strike the statement of facts from the files and record herein and to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the said statement of facts was not properly certified by the trial court. It does not appear from the certificate to the statement of facts in this case that the said statement contains all the material facts in the said cause. On the authority of Enos v. Wilcox, 3 Wash. 44 (28 Pac. Rep. 364); Cadwell v. First National Bank, 3 Wash. 188 (28 Pac. Rep. 365), and an unbroken line of decisions of this court, the motion will be sustained, the statement stricken and the appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirby v. Collins, 32 P. 1060, 6 Wash. 297, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 284 (Wash. 1893).

32 P. 1060 (Kirby v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baskett v. City of Seattle
93 P.2d 769 (Washington Supreme Court, 1939)
Deller v. Long
165 P. 98 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)
State v. Hankins
160 P. 307 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
Taylor v. Andres
145 P. 991 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)
Kane v. Kane
77 P. 842 (Washington Supreme Court, 1904)