Kirby v. Coles

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Kirby v. Coles

14 N.J.L. 576

DecidedFebruary 15, 1835

StatusPublished

This text of 14 N.J.L. 576 (Kirby v. Coles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirby v. Coles, 14 N.J.L. 576 (N.J. 1835).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Take the rule. The necessity of this course

results from the provisions of the act of assembly limiting the right of prosecuting a writ of certiorari to the period of ninety days after the making of a final decree in the Orphans’ Court, Rev. Laws, 787, sec. 33, in consequence of which, it frequently happens, that the certiorari must be returnable here, before it can be presented to the Orphans’ Court, and be responded to by that court. It is reasonable in such cases that the writ should be continued and time given to obtain and perfect a proper return thereto, by a rule of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Take the rule. The necessity of this course

results from the provisions of the act of assembly limiting the right of prosecuting a writ of certiorari to the period of ninety days after the making of a final decree in the Orphans’ Court, Rev. Laws, 787, sec. 33, in consequence of which, it frequently happens, that the certiorari must be returnable here, before it can be presented to the Orphans’ Court, and be responded to by that court. It is reasonable in such cases that the writ should be continued and time given to obtain and perfect a proper return thereto, by a rule of this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 N.J.L. 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirby-v-coles-nj-1835.